I work for the home. Every decision is guided by market data, strategy, and what will protect the value of the asset—not personal agendas or emotions.

Traditional agents typically represent one party. In divorce, that can create tension or distrust. My role is structured, transparent, and collaborative—designed specifically for divorce-related situations.

Yes. Through The Divorce Collab, I regularly collaborate with legal and financial professionals so real estate decisions support the overall divorce strategy.

Less conflict. Clearer communication. Smarter decisions. And a smoother path forward for everyone involved.

Most people choose one of three paths: sell and split the net proceeds, one spouse keeps the home and buys out the other, or temporary co-ownership (sometimes called a deferred sale). The right choice depends on mortgage terms, equity, kids, timing, and whether one person can qualify on their own.

Not necessarily. Divorce and the home decision can run on parallel tracks. Some couples sell right away, others refinance or do a buyout, and some keep the home temporarily if the timing supports it. The key is making sure the agreement is realistic and executable with lending guidelines.

Yes, but it needs clear guardrails: payment responsibility, repair decisions, buyout triggers, sale timeline, and what happens if someone misses payments. Co-ownership only works when expectations are written and realistic.

Decide in writing who approves repairs, who pays, spending limits without mutual consent, and how you handle urgent issues. This prevents fights and protects the asset.

Ideally, you choose a neutral, divorce-trained agent both parties trust. The goal is fewer misunderstandings, cleaner communication, and a process that protects both sides and the asset.

The big ones are uncleared liens, HELOCs, judgments, unpaid contractors, and deed issues. These can delay closing and reduce proceeds, so it’s better to surface them early.